View Single Post
Posts: 658 | Thanked: 777 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Norway
#48
resistive screen is maybe not a huge plus but is definetly a plus, since resistive touch tehnology is much more advanced than capacitive crap...
I disagree that its a plus as a general rule, it might be more advanced but the devices Ive used (n97 and n900) with resistive have been hell to navigate with compared to multitouch capacitive which just feels better.

Of course, its a matter of preference. Ive been toying around with my N900 as of late, and compared to my n9 and sgs2 its... well it might just be unusual since Im used by now to very responsive capacitive screens.

I do however miss the mousepointer in microB... mouseovermenus on some sites are there, and nothing can be done in any browser Ive used since microB, and thats pressurescreen for ya I guess.

I just get the feeling that capacitive are easier to use, while lacking some of the accuracy of the capacitive on the N900.

What good have you seen out of those dual cores?
Doesnt the SGS2 stock browser use dualcore? I dont care about dualcore that much, its more the RAM that hits, I guess.

My N900 is slow as **** in certain things, but that might not be a HW issue at all. Like app manager. Or just general whooping around the menus and apps.

Im not saying its unbearable, Im just saying its slower than SGS2/N9.
__________________
My Nokia N9 Idea. Support its awesomeness!
http://www.ideasproject.com/ideas/12265