View Single Post
Posts: 25 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#266
Funny, how philosophical we can be, it's attracting to dispute the things on higher level than eat'n sleep.
Originally Posted by slai View Post
Then again you could always justify it like this: "if its possible, its right to do".
That was not really my point. When is it impossible to pay, if you use it for profit e.g.? If you find impossible to pay, it still may be right to do.

Originally Posted by slai View Post
And as morals are changed according to circumstance and context, you cant really find a "global unified moral code" on any matter.
Actually, the point is that people dont want to accept "the global unified moral code" (that exists) and they rather develop their own, that matches better their behavior. What you said is just a matter of the level of person's insanity - you really can believe that shooting people on some Norway island is the good.

You have nicely compared the pros/cons, but it already walks on the way 'there is no g.u.m.c', there is just good/bad for me.