Thread
:
[Development] kernel-power
View Single Post
Estel
2011-12-20 , 01:57
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#
45
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=80993
Pali, with all due respect, I thin that it's time to screw aesthetic, and finally "fork" kp package, to get rid of "ancient" un-promoteable bug. Situation, where sane users (sticking to extras, if they don't feel comfortable with -testing and -devel) are punished by installing non-working version, which sits in
*stable*
and can - probably - bring device into state of "reflash needed", is absolutely out of the line.
I know rationale behind keeping with same package "line", and generally agree with it, but I think that - after so many months - rationale being "forking" kp package into another package instance family is *much* better.
/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover
MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1
|
ereswap
|
bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
Quote & Reply
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
petur
Estel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Estel
Find all posts by Estel