Thread: Difference beetween Nokia, LV, ULV, XLV, Ideal
View Single Post
geneven is offline geneven
2011-12-25 , 03:12
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#4
Originally Posted by fw190 View Post
Well check the wiki here on TMO. There are people against OC and in favor of it. Currently I'm on KP49 and on DSP profile if I dont forget to turn it on generally the stock settings are good for me. The profiles like ULV, XLV... are supposed to save battery and give performance but it is said that the calculations in it are wrong/not perfect and should be tweaked for each device. Sometimes in daily use I think that OC is overated. For answering cals and sending sms 600mhz on standard stock settings is OK.
ULV, XLV, etc have nothing to do with overclocking, except that the kernel that allows you to overclock if you want to (I do) also allows you to use these settings if you want to (I do).

The reason that different N900s have different best settings has nothing to do with whether the calculations are wrong/not perfect as you said, but because N900s are not identical and the only way you can find out what is best for your N900 is by testing it.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.