Thread
:
Long and Overdue (hypothetical poll)
View Single Post
Hurrian
2011-12-29 , 13:52
Posts: 1,225 | Thanked: 1,905 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Quezon City, Philippines
#
8
Wut.
I am detecting a lot of butthurt in this thread.
The N95 had polished software for it's time (RAM was lacking, but that's another issue, one of Nokia making it's high end smartphones for the longest time have the shittiest hardware)
Note though, that the N95's camera still skullf0cks most 5MPx phone cameras today.
The N900 was a Nokia Internet Tablet deriviative. You should've known what to expect. You know, half-baked software. Oh, and it wasn't marketed like mad. Instead, the N97 (with truly terrible software, and you should be mad about this waste of resources instead) was being pushed as the flagship.
If you couldn't bear to use a rough, powerful OS like Maemo, you probably should've just bought a Milestone or a 3GS.
And finally, the N9 is not a N900 replacement. It's a N8 replacement. If you browsed tmo for some time you'd know why it wasn't set to replace the N900.
__________________
N9
PR 1.3 Open Mode +
kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot
, working on
Glacier
for Nemo.
Quote & Reply
|
Hurrian
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Hurrian
Visit Hurrian's homepage!
Find all posts by Hurrian