Let me clarify, I'm talking about the frustration when a good chunk of bugs submitted for the N900 are replied with a "WONT FIX" and unfortunately it looks as if the N9 might be down the same road after a short while. For instance, there's a front facing camera on the N9, what the heck is it there for if there's no STOCK software (shouldn't have to rely on 3-rd party, that would be a slap to the face if we had to) available to make use of it.

When I bought the N900, I thought Nokia would take a different approach than it did with Symbian. Since the N900 ran a beautiful OS with a spectacular UI, I assumed there would be less problems with the OS compared to what many have experienced with Symbian around the N95/N97 era and I was looking forward to purchasing a Nokia, which is known for its open, almost-fully customizable OSes. What Nokia didn't make clear was that the N900 was for "market research" purposes and was not mainstream. I didn't find that out till after I purchased the N900 and went thoroughly through the forums. A customer should not have to be informed indirectly like that and rather it should have been CLEARLY written on the device's specs/features instead of having to come to the conclusion myself after I had made the purchase and when it was too late to return. I am not upset with the N900, it is a fantastic device, I am upset with its negligent support by its manufacturer, Nokia. Now I have the N9, but I am concerned with its support. Will we have to go through the same thing, or maybe it might be even worse support with the current focus of Nokia being on WP?