Thread
:
Stock camera better than FCamera?
View Single Post
Estel
2012-01-06 , 21:36
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#
29
Thanks, your profile works great! I was able to develop RAW using ufRAW without this damn vignette.
One thing bothers me, yet. Upon loading photo to CornerFix - before even loading filter - in left part of window, it was shown with both correct white balance, and without vignette! Yet, loading it into any RAw developer (be it ufRAW, or adobe one), camera white balance is *not* available, and vignette is present. Of course, vignette can be deleted using Your profile in cornerfix, and white balance adjusted manually, but I wonder if it's somehow possible to 'get' those proper white balance, that we see in original image, upon loading it to corner fix? Or is it just some kind of thumbnail, created during JPG processing on N900, and saved into RAW .dng?
In some aspects, such file has better white balance, that I was able to get using ufRAW. nothing very important, but I really wonder if our .dng's have some data inside, that isn't properly used by RAW developers, or is it just useless thumbnail.
// Edit
If I open .dng in CornerFix without choosing profile, and save it as new one (without any operation), new file - upon opening -
*doesn't*
show as correct white balance one. So, either such additional data are dropped during save process in CornerFix (be it some exif magic, or just useless thumbnail), or I don't get something.
/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover
MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1
|
ereswap
|
bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
Quote & Reply
|
Estel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Estel
Find all posts by Estel