Thread: camera-ui2 (now a part of CSSU) (updated 09. May)
View Single Post
woody14619's Avatar
woody14619 is offline woody14619
2012-01-20 , 19:45
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#836
Originally Posted by Mohammad View Post
yes i would also like to know why not
as it has no conflict with HD rec
That is patently false. A blatant lie, and worst of all you know it.

Both patches change settings in how the system handles swapping, and in some cases adjusts settings that directly affect dsp use. Those can have a huge impact on normal recording, yet alone HD recording.

The person responsable for bringing HD recording to the N900 (freemangordon) has explicitly said that these patches cause conflicts in 720p recording. Further, the author of the patches (karam) says right there in the same thread:
Originally Posted by karam View Post
and the creation if speedpatch was a result of testing
perhaps i have no huge expert to explain how it does that
but according to speedpatch testers .. it appeared that it does something
So by his own admission, karam doesn't know what he's doing. He's making changes and basing if those changes are good or not by getting "feedback" from testers. And I'm betting most of those testers don't do 720p recording.

What amazes me, is that you know all this, because you thanked the post above! So you saw this thread, know that the leader of bringing 720p to N900 said this patch is in conflict, left evidence to the fact that you saw this, but come here and say "there's no conflict"? How can you reconcile that?
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: