View Single Post
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#848
Originally Posted by RichardN900 View Post
OK, i have now toped it at 850 would this be enough? I think that if it's dynamic i could let it get up to 900.
Why low limit at 500? Any issue with using 250 or 125?
850 should be fine. I (and many others) use 500 as the low point for a few reasons. One is the "race to idle" theory, where in if you have short jobs that happen on occasion (a CPU wakeup to check on a file or what not) if that happens at 500Mhz vs slower, it completes faster and thus goes back to sleep sooner, saving power. There's also a tested and proven fact that the power vs cpu use efficiency is maxed out very close to 500Mhz. It's what the chip was designed to work at, and where most of the power-saving comes into play.

Also, FYI: 125 is in many cases unstable. Enough so that Nokia dropped it from their scaled listing, starting at 250 instead.

Originally Posted by RichardN900 View Post
I ussually try to avoid anything that has any serious warning or does not makes me feel sure enough.
As i know my limitations i usually dont go too far on unknow terrain. (when i want to go far i start asking a lot of questions )
Same thing I do. Nothing wrong with asking questions when you're not sure what's going on. The three most useful and honest words in English are "I don't know". You should never be afraid to admit that, or to question what you know.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: