View Single Post
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 3,209 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Germany
#2527
Originally Posted by reinob View Post
Not sure about this, but if you compile the whole system (easy debian in this case) with HF you might also need an adapted kernel (unless the interface between libc and kernel is independent of the architecture/ABI, which is probably not the case).
Since I believe* the existing Maemo kernel makes best use of the hardware, it should already be armhf compatible. No idea if that's actually necessary or if an armhf-compatible libc would suffice, but if it is necessary that shouldn't be a problem.

Originally Posted by reinob View Post
Some day we'll be able to boot an HF-compiled debian with an upstream kernel, but it'll take some time until that happens..
Well I think recompiling the whole Easy Debian software doesn't make much sense. If that's what you want to do I think Arch or Gentoo would be better distributions. Plus, recompiling every binary with armhf support would practically mean to create a new architecture on our own. I have thought about that earlier but I didn't find it practical then and I don't think so now.
That's where the Debian's official armhf port comes in handy now. Theoretically we could start building armhf images right away. The reason why I think there will be a delay of over a year is that it doesn't make much sense to base Easy Debian on Testing or even Unstable since it's supposed to be useable for everybody, not just for Debian experts (heck, I don't even consider myself to be one). Therefore I think the Wheezy freeze is the first date that might make an armhf Easy Debian useful.

*) read: I have absolutely no clue but it would be wise
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: