View Single Post
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2924
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Why not restore them if they exist? You go out of your way to back them up, and then don't restore them? If there were files, you're not restoring them on uninstall. That's a change.
i will explain why
because restoring them for people who have used the script version before (+10000) will cause the xterm message to appear
because the backed up ones have the speedpatch modifications
and by default there are no .profile nor .bashrc at /home/user
unless created by user and they are already backed up as *.bak

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
I also see you never addressed one key point of what I was saying. Your description (both here and in the deb) says you're creating cgroups for the desktop and for apps, when in fact you're doing neither. They only cgroup you're making is for bash and shell scripts using bash. The desktop and user apps are already in a cgroup, created by Nokia as part of the kernel compile.
Can you please address why you're lying about what you're doing?
pr1.3 the actual update when nokia used to take care of N900 was released on October/2010
while speedpatch (cgroup patch) was first mentioned by the original author on November/2010 .. after a month of the update

and check what's inside /dev/cgroup folder+ tell me something which has been effected *badly* with speedpatch after removing what nokia did
not only theoretical b*llsh*t

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
The kernel already does that if there's a lockup, even if you default it to something else. If you load a profile as default, and the system reboots twice in the span of a couple minutes, the kernel automatically rejects loading the default config and uses the built-in Nokia-based values (250-600, high-voltage). That's been in there since Titan's kernels, well before KP. The fact that you don't know this, shows how little you know about this whole process.
are you kidding me ?
of course i know this
it also says that *unexpected reboot ...etc your settings were not loaded* or so

but actually i did kernel-config default to default as an Reserve method

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Again, you show you have no idea what you're talking about. A missing default kernel profile will never cause a reboot loop. A missing module or kernel file may, but a profile never will. It will simply stick with the built-in Nokia defaults if the profile it's instructed to read is not present, or is corrupt in some way.
again i tell you : are you kidding me .. of course i know this too
i say again it's a Reserve method

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Nokia, as part of the phone app, triggers the phone app to get real-time priority, and locks the kernel at a set speed (600 as I recall). At that speed, the phone app takes about 60% of the CPU and allows enough background time for apps to continue to function if needed. I made plenty of calls using the stock 250-600 kernel and noticed no quality issues. If you're seeing issues, it's probably because you're either running something highly CPU intensive in the background, or because you've installed a speedpatch that's screwing around with cgroups and letting shell scripts take higher priority than they should!
now this is pretty funny
first i didn't have any problems or lack of quality as well
AND USING BOTH PATCHES
BUT
i made an update that included the change to 7x0-805 when a call is received only !!! (the couple a minutes you see the *who is calling you screen*)
after putting your ear .. normal overclock profile will get activated (250-805)
and users told me it really get more responsive with it especially the time when changing from portrait to landscape accidentally on when N900 is ringing

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Also, you again show ignorance on your own scripts. In the postinst for batterypatch, you check for version 42, 47, and 48 of KP, and copy the config settings from /opt/dbus-scripts/ to /usr/share/kernel-power-settings. The config files put in place for those kernels is:
call: 750-850 non-call:250-805 sleep:125-600 (all with SR2 set)
For all other kernels, the files used are
call: 720-850 non-call:250-805 sleep:125-600 (all with SR1 & 2 set!)
as i said above
this OC lasts until you answer the cal
and what the h*ll does it have to do with ignorance

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Also, for all but 42, 47, and 48, you're enabling SR1, another problem. You do know that with K49 (and 43, 44, 45, & 46) that SR1 is not always stable, right? The patch to handle that is slated for K50, and only those doing kernel testing have a version of K49 that might be recent enough to allow this in a stable way. Did you know SR1 is also never stable for 125Mhz, since Nokia never enabled it and never setup the e-fuse stuff for that? Yet you tinker with it.
no no no no that's not true
i have VDD1 disabled in BP4 with KP42-46-47-48 !!!
check with *larger screen to see well*

Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
The biggest issues are the crazy (7X0-850) overclocking, use of SR1, and use of unstable 125Mhz. If you took those issues out, it wouldn't be all that bad. But those alone, yet alone staked with other mods, make the whole deck of cards wobbly.
after seeing the post from freemangordon saying that him self uses 125mhz and i have been using it too since 1 year
it's stable

and overclocking normally is 250-805
only when a call is received : 7X0 - 805 (not 850)
it's stable too

and if you have a sh*tty N900 then use the package (batterypatch-for-unstable)

Originally Posted by ed_boner View Post
maybe mohammad is karam evil twin..dont know and dont care...just want a solution to get rid of these patches efectively without reflash...
believe me
i'm far away from being evil


Originally Posted by demolition View Post

ps Karam: you need to sort out your Karma. Single figures makes you look like a proper shady character!
honestly i can't
i don't have the time doing any of it
this year i have a bakaloriat

i'm actually spending time i don't have @ tmo





.......... now let me explain everything clearly about patches:

explaining of what batterypatch does:

1- when installing :
postins : it stets kernel-config to default
same as prerm
reason : some users reported having reboots loops after uninstalling BP
after this it's solved (as i said before it's a Reserve method)
it totally doesn't effect anything
because after locking /unlocking overclock or underclock profiles will be loaded

when installing : it detects the kerne-power installed
so it can put the profile with 750 or 720 mhz

and for stablity :
KPv49 OC with 805 + vdd1 is stable for most devices
also freemangordon said 125 is OK

KPv49> sets 805 + vdd1 = 0
is it unstable here ?

now why OC to 805 ?
well because conversative module is slow but it saves more battery than ondemand so it needs to be OCed to be usable

PS : there is a version batterypatch-for-unstable check that (already mentioned that)

all clear about installing process and it's stability ?

2- when using N900
if you lock the screen with keyboard in
it will renice background processes and mlodest , browser, image-viewer
it sets vfs to 10 which saves battery in standby
.and loads underclolck profile
which has nothing unstable in it

3- when unlocking
everything above is reversed to normal
but loading overclock profile which has conversative module in use
anything unstable here ?

4- when uninstalling :
As for speedpatch :
it removes all the files it added and backs up .profile and .bashrc (if any are existed by user)
and by default there are no .profile nor .bashrc at /home/user
(i have already said this)

i can't see anything that does a permanent change


As for batterypatch:

it removes every file it added and sets kernel-config to use default profile avoiding any possible problems

any permanent change here ?
there are not any
...
can you now explain what are the unstable or changes that cause permanent damage

PS again i may not have time to reply another post

oh almost forgot
@seker_94
when finished
reply what happens with you
AND FOR NOW ... ONLY TRY WITH SPEEDPATCH AS WE WILL GET TO BATTERYPATCH LATER

and believe me .. when i get convinced of the harm of them
i will remove from extras

Thank you

Last edited by karam; 2012-01-25 at 12:36.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post: