View Single Post
Moonshine's Avatar
Posts: 469 | Thanked: 88 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montana
#26
Originally Posted by Eric Qel-Droma View Post
But does this work for EVERY application? It seems like everytime someone on these forums has a problem, the first answer is something like "but did you reflash the os and then download the tarball from this guy's site and blah blah blah..." OR the answer is simply "Yeah, that's buggy. We'll ask the Linux gods for a new one and hopefully they'll comply."

I don't mean to get snarky, and I really appreciate your post. However, I have yet to see anything on here that convinces me that I should want to deal with the rather constant headaches of an n800 at this point.
Not a problem, I don't get any commission regardless of your choice.

As for "any/every" application the answer would be no. However, for popular/common/widespread applications the answer is yes.

Anyone who creates or ports an application for the NITs can make a simple one click installer and repository for it *if they want*. However for some of the more technical or beta applications being ported, they may not go through the trouble. (As it's safe to assume anyone using them can do a simple install from a package) I still think this is the exception not the rule though. Out of everything I have on my tablet, only subversion, rsync and some unix commands were installed directly from some package that I can remember.

It's important to remember that in forums you'll find a unique cross section of users also. Many are new and come to post questions and problems, as that's what the forums are good for. You certainly won't find yourself continually reflashing or with constant headaches though.

Originally Posted by Eric Qel-Droma View Post
For what it's worth, I have tried Linux on my desktop and my laptop before, and I did not find it to be the Windows killer everyone says it is. That doesn't mean it was worthless, but my experience tells me that it is not for everyone.
I agree. I only have 1 Linux desktop the others are all Windows Vista. Servers I manage are another story, all Linux. However, on a portable mobile device I think things are different. My mother certainly couldn't tell she was using a Linux handheld when trying my tablet this xmas. A desktop would be a different story.

Originally Posted by Eric Qel-Droma View Post
This is a very helpful portion of your post. I'm really not looking for something I can tinker with--I want basic internet and PIM functions, specifically a calendar and an alarm clock. I want a portable media player. I have iTunes right now (but no iPod, believe it or not) and I have already given them my Cc# because I used iTunes for watching BSG last season. (Not so much in the coming season, of course, but that's beside the point.) So I guess it's pretty clear that, just like Linux, the iPod Touch is not for everyone.

Eric
Well, there is an alarm clock built into OS2008 so your covered there. There are calendar options also including Web ones like Google Calendar or applications like GPE Calendar, etc, but I don't use any of them so I'm not much help there.

As for playing music and video I think you'd be fine with either. The tradeoff is just a little less UI/sync polish on the NITs vs. less file options/smaller lower rez screen on the Apple gear.

I'm certainly not saying the Touch is a stupid piece of gear, it just didn't do enough for me to deserve its pricing or a place in my pocket. Browsing is much better on the Nokia IMO and that's something I use all the time. It also has a lot more communcation options (IM, VOIP, Skype, etc) I like the glossy simplicity of the Touch, but in the end that comes with the cost of less features and expandibility. For example I still don't think it's possible to delete a photo on the Touch itself. At least I couldn't see how to do it. It seems like everything goes through the iTunes software for managment. Except the wifi Apple iTunes store of course. Ok that was a dig.

Last edited by Moonshine; 2007-12-26 at 18:15.