View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#185
Originally Posted by elemental View Post
<SNIP>I think there are many better things we can come up with. And if we want to fill bugs like this one it will be terrible. I am developer and personally it looks like child screaming. Bugs/feature requests should not cause additional difficulties like this one.
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
<SNIP>I must admit I stopped reading the bug once I realised it was just a long list of issues and suggestions (I actually gave up on your original post too due to the wall of text formatting! ) If you know it's not how it's meant to be done, I don't understand why you didn't do it the right way - your bug is not going to be taken seriously so don't be surprised if it gets knocked on the head Resolved/Invalid because it's impossible to do anything else meaningful with it.
In his defense....
I've actually seen him lodge many other bug reports & enhancement requests the correct way.
I guess he just got tired...

Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
Same as before - none.
That's not to say that API's haven't been added (or even bug fixed) to allow third-party applications to take advantage of the front facing camera (eg. Peregrine), but in terms of the stock apps there is still no support.
Sigh ... And Peregrine devs have been MIA for mths.
When one approaches them for more detail, they're quite non-communicative.

Originally Posted by marxian View Post
No problems here.
Weird, I wonder why he's still experiencing the bug...
Oh thank God, please let us know if it creeps in again!
It was a particularly nasty bug, that seemed to affect a very large subset of users.

Last edited by jalyst; 2012-01-31 at 16:09.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: