I really appreciate Your work, yet I still don't see any point in maintaining it like this. It seems, that there is consensus - everyone like seconds in landscape + one time alarms should stay inactive, not disappear. At least, that is what comes from reading *every* post after this "self-fork" thing started.

The funniest thing, is that such versions is *not* available - we still have to choose between seconds OR not disappearing alarms.

I'm not demanding anything - just "stating" current situation, which is little irrational IMO, to say at least. I have yet to see single person, that would not be happy with *one* version of Open source worldclock - adding seconds in landscape, and preserving alarms like stock.

I also don't get, why You hesitate to "mainstream" seconds feature - adding portrait support was much bigger "change". Also, the "closest to stock" version, in fact got bug, that initiate 10% CPU usage on each minute change (in landscape), due to bakcground redraw. I don't see any sane reason, to leave this as "OK".

/Estel

// Edit

Maybe a "poll" about seconds in landscape should be added to this thread? It's quite grotesque for such straight-forward (and already implemented, yet not "enabled"!) feature, but, if this could help to end this "twopath"...