View Single Post
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#2691
Originally Posted by thedarkus View Post
Ok guys, thank you for your replies.

Yes, my english sucks so often i miss something reading 3ds.

I know battery patch is not developed by Pali, it was my just 2 cents about it.

In reply to Pali, i'm already using a not default profile, to undervolt my phone. I'm currently running an ULV profile without no stability issues. I did different test using the phone at 600, 720, 805 and 850 MHz too, with no significative differences in battery drain. Is still higher than with the stock kernel.

I also reflashed my phone, to have a fresh and clean installation for the PK, but the problem are still unsolved.

The thing that, more than other, sound me weird, is the time needed to charge the battery: 2hrs, sometimes less too, when with the default kernel is longer, almost 3 hrs or more. Obviously, i tested a second battery too, with the same results.

In addition, i daily use Cony to monitor process in background, there is not something wrong running in background. It just seems that my battery is recognized with less capacity than usual.

No one of you noticed the same problem?


d!
Could you please attach here dmesg output, powertop output, your /etc/default/kernel-power and /dev/mtd2 from your freshly flashed device with KP49 installed. Also you may try pre50 version from this post to check if it solves the issue.

On the side note - how do you measure battery drain?

@Pali - did you build .debs with my latest patches and audiofilter patch disabled?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: