Thread: [Announce] kernel-power stable v49 in Extras-Testing
View Single Post
sulu is offline sulu
2012-02-05 , 20:28
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 3,209 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Germany
#2756
KPv49 works fine for me circa one week now and v42 has been working fine since I bought my N900. I never encountered any battery drain.

It seems like there are spare values for what might have been a 125MHz setting (the 2nd value in $vsel andf $rate doesn't belong there). I tried fixing it by adding a 125MHz setting to the FREQS line in my profile but the error didn't change.

My evil hack for now is to add these two lines to kernel-config just before $vsel and $rate are written to the files to delete the 2nd value of each line:
Code:
vsel=`echo $vsel | sed s/\ [0-9]\\\+//`
rate=`echo $rate | sed s/\ [0-9]\\\+//`
It works for me but it's really just an ugly evil hack, so it doesn't qualify as a patch at all.

Edit:
Can somebody who runs v49 and uses a profile file please post his file so that I can try to find any critical differences?
Last edited by sulu; 2012-02-05 at 20:36.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: