View Single Post
Posts: 1,033 | Thanked: 1,013 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#31
Originally Posted by ibrakalifa View Post
ooooh cool, show me the sources, BS, u just too much says dude, LOL

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3...&idPhone2=4037


and LG didnt lost that much money to produce it?, nokia doing some riset before they launch it, but why with old chipset then, dont get blinded by nokia name, i talk about the hardware,
Yes, hardware. Open up your brain, and learn that Nokia spent billions in MeeGo R&D, N9 design R&D, camera technology R&D, etc. Also, better screen technology, BT 4.0, better camera module, NFC, etc, are all hardware and increase cost. MeeGo has been in development for a long time and OMAP 3 was the base, i.e. getting all the code right on that SoC.

BTW, what is your issue with OMAP 3? It's not like MeeGo is as demanding and crappily programmed as Android. Is it smooth? Is it innovative? Is it unique? The answer to all the above is YES, so either STFU or GTFO.

Only N9 drawback is a dirtbag that is refered to by the name of Elop.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to patlak For This Useful Post: