View Single Post
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 64 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ EU
#3056
Originally Posted by karam View Post
@yrannadx

i have never got 10 days without batterypatch
and if you don't like it , then don't use it. it's up to you to decide
i try my best to provide the most needed solutions for N900
(performance, battery life)
It's not only about my personal decision to use or not these patches. Since I am hundred percent convinced that this patch is useless and that I can have 10 days standby without it, then it is my duty to tell other this fact. After all why are we here in this community, if not for helping each other with the usage of our devices and solve other users problems?

The fact that the feedback is already very mixed, would bring me if I would be a developer, a question mark. While experienced contributors clearly are explaining and proving why the patch is useless, other users are claiming battery improvement. It might be that some users don't know how to load for example dsp profile, and for that reason battery patch was helping them. Others might just want to help you with good feedback just because of subjective reasons, reasons which I don't think is appropriate to raise here.

I believe you have good intention while trying to improve the device, but maybe it is time to give up and recognize that, while your patch was useful in the past, now with the new kernels 49 and above, your patch is obsolete. This happens many times in IT industry for many applications, and it is not a shame. It is just normal evolution of the technology.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yrannadx For This Useful Post: