View Single Post
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#3067
Originally Posted by karam View Post
.
.
.
nokia didn't use cgroup
they used ohmd to do as cgroup does
but i can see that cgroup gives more responsible and performance
Bullsh|t, do "cat /proc/mounts | grep syspart" on a device without "speedpatch" installed and you will see:

cgroup /syspart cgroup rw,freezer,memory,cpu 0 0

ohmd distributes processes along cgroups using /usr/share/policy/current/rx51/syspart.conf.

Kernel does not distribute processes to cgroups, it is userland who should do it


read 1st post
There is nothing in the OP describing how the processes are distributed along different cgroups.

how would it be speedup if it was AS before
i used the NOKIA configs with cgroup which gave a quite good result
PS: older version didn't use Nokia configs and though improved N900 a bit (mostly noticed :hildon-desktop)
By saying AS BEFORE I meant that those users have had a previous version of SP before installing latest, which reverts cgroups configuration to stock (excluding different mount point).

currently i haven't seen any SW that modifies /syspart
and if any future SWs
well thaey will have to check for speedpatch existen in postinst

anything else would you come up with ?
perhaps you would say "the new nokia Firmware pr1.4 WILL NOT be compatible with speedpatch in future"
Currently you don't see obvious things, let alone some future software. Take it as a piece of advice - do not modify system configurations which could affect current/future SW except absolutely neccessary. Which is not the case with speedpatch.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: