View Single Post
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#3074
Originally Posted by karam View Post
i haves posted about pmconfig and you have shouted on me because i didn't explained enough
What?

I was having a conversation, just before you chimed in, with someone who asked if changing pmconfig would be effective while he was using battery-patch. I told him, factually: No, changing pmconfig would not be effective because battery-patch changes the config on the fly.

The post here quotes your post in the K49 thread, where you said:
Originally Posted by karam View Post
and woody ?? (again)! i have never stated that i have adapted cgroup to syspart before
didn't like this from u
NOWHERE did mention anything about cgroups, or syspart, or anything related to either. In fact, the only mention of speed-patch at all was that I noted your comment in this thread that the "new speed-patch" had a major change in how it worked. And for that reason, I said there was no way to know if it was still seamlessly removable, as the last version was, until an independent review of the package was done.

So tell me, what did you mean by the quote above? Where did you see me claiming anything about what you had done, or how you had done it? I haven't said a single thing about cgroups or syspart. You put words in my mouth, which is frankly rude and not something I tolerate.

Originally Posted by karam View Post
IF YOU NOTICED THAT THEIR IS NONE OF THE CODES YOU GAVE ME WHICH I USED !!
Really? I mentioned in this thread weeks ago that you should be wrapping backup commands with checks to make sure they didn't already exist. We rehashed that again in PM minutes before your latest release, and such code is now in your latest script. (That's a good thing, btw.)

You used a less-efficient method, doing if [ -f x.sp] then exit; else mv x x.sp; fi instead of the suggestion I made of if [ ! -e x.sp] then mv x x.sp; fi, but in essence it's the same thing. Yes, you "did it on your own", but you didn't even have the idea that it needed to be done until I noted it. The fact that previous versions of speed-patch were causing xterm errors is evidence and a direct result of you not doing this type of checking in the past. The fact that the xterm errors existed for as long as they did is evidence that you didn't know how to solve the issue until you were helped with it.

Originally Posted by karam View Post
NOW THIS IS CHILDISH
Yes, using all caps, and claiming people said things about you when they did not is childish. Which is exactly what you've done, repeatedly in the past 2 days.

Tell me, which is more childish?
  • Responding politely to PM requests for help on scripting while that same person is bashing you in a public forum, any lying about what you said.
  • Claiming repeatedly that someone said something they never said, and throwing a hissy fit about it when they call you on it.
Who is being more mature?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: