Thread: nokia should wake up and use N9 as flagship
View Single Post
Lumiaman
2012-02-21 , 22:54
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#113
Originally Posted by don_falcone View Post
Question: are you BigBadGuber? Just guessing from your posting history (owned an iPhone, liking terms like "just works" and "hassle-free", being in the US, talking about email client vs. your company IT etc. etc.)
Why aren't you just simply posting w/ like-minded people on wee-pee-central, but here? I guess your chances of convincing a noticeable share of TMO members to try out or move to WP is marginal at best. But convince me, if otherwise.
do you have anything better to do, than analyze my posts and comparing me to your alter ego.

Lets see, what did I say that can offend you.
Nokia N9 has more hardware issues than Lumia800: True
Lumia 800 benefited from Nokia N9 going out first and breaking in the production line: True
Nokia N9 OS half baked: True
Lumia 800 smooth and good at what it does: True

what is the problem with above analysis? Both are Nokia phones. One is supposed to bring bread to the table (Lumia 800), and the other was pre-Elop, the usual half baked Nokia OS that has no chance of competing realistically with the big boys. I happen to own both N9 64Gb white and Lumia 800 cyan. N9 is in the box and Lumia is in my hands. Not because I hate N9 or harmattan, but because Lumia IS better for me, more stable and easier user interface at this moment. N9 doesnt have a chance as a flagship for the masses.