View Single Post
Kangal's Avatar
Posts: 1,789 | Thanked: 1,699 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#7
Originally Posted by ammyt View Post
Nah seriously, that thing just made my PC pi$$ its pants.
A 1.5 GHz 5Core Tegra III (4A9 + Companion A5?), 4.7-inch True HD IPS LCD (1280x720), 2,150mAh battery...

You see we used to get dazzled when we see/imagine such specs, but it's all reality now.

http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/l...ream-sandwich/
My NOTE is more advanced than that:
-The features (GLONASS and active digitizer on the NOTE)
-Dualcore beats Quadcore - on Android they're equally fast (maybe the Exynos is even faster), but Exynos will likely use less battery, wont get as hot as the Tegra3, supports open-source codecs
-The screen tech on NOTE is better (lower battery drain, deep blacks and vivid colours)
-The screen on the NOTE is better (higher resolution, bigger size)
-The NOTE WILL NOT get on-screen buttons so the screen space and resolution will be even higher
-The NOTE is available now, cheaper, has a big community, will be getting ICS soon (officially/community)

But compared to the Gnex, this is a worthy rival...so I say:

Last edited by Kangal; 2012-02-24 at 04:00.