I can't be bothered finding a press release to cite your own point. For my part, you do realize I pointed out two platforms (Amazon Kindle and Nook Color) where changes (synonymous with customization) in Android were made at the CORE of the operating system (i.e. not just the skins), right? I think I provided a sufficiently lucent explanation of that and your language semantics danced around addressing the clear question I asked given the points I've made. I'm not sure that the openness of Android's operating system (even at its CORE... which, near as I can tell is open enough for Kindle/Nook/CyanogenMOD/etc) was ever brought up as a tangible point of this question about why Nokia wouldn't want to put what you seem to claim is such an excellent mapping program out onto other platforms such as Android. Your claim to objectivity is in question, considering the way you've skirted the question and provided clearly and provably incorrect argument back to a simple question: what mapping issue? Aren't you proving here why Nokia Maps should be on MORE platforms, like Android, not less? I'm still not sure you understand your own point.