It's quite interesting, as AFAIK Pali doesn't feel ignored (after initial and very fast explaining why Couincil wasn't able to help, due to lack of answer from X-Fade), yet *You* speak - somehow - in his name about penalties. Quite ridiculous.

Without any offense, I would not call you "active" CSSU developer - at least, for many months. Take my deepest excuses, if I'm wrong.

Please understand, that it's very problematic to inform (precisely) people that jump in-between, about issues that are clear and obvious to majority (or at least, interested parties). Here we end up in place, where we actually agree totally - I think proper documentation via available tools (council blog etc) is a must, and if done properly, that would make mentioned problem of informing "awakened ones" a non-existent.

There was a (quite long) period of time (2 or 3 times), where CSSU was in stall, despite hving *tons* of code ready for testing - just because one person went off-line, and CSSU team nor council had tools to pass maintainership into someone's else hands. *Of course* there was a simple solution, yet, it would require X-Fade cooperation, and he was - it's tempting to say "as always" - not contactable.

Now CSSU problem is semi-fixed - MAG created way for other people from CSSU to send files as him - yet, it isn't solution per se. Would not work, if he had been hit by a bus, instead of jsut disappearing.

Your lack of information about all of those issues reinforce my statement, that you doesn't seem to be active CSSU developer for now. Again, no offense meant here - I still agree, that there should be (and for that, we have tools) a way to precisely document issues, and inform people about them, no matter if they were absent for week or for a 6 months.

/Estel

// Edit

It;s not a matter of new vs old, or lack of kickstand - we're talking about real code-side problems. Fortunately, sometimes, even people who have received N950 see that and keep focusing on more capable device (see Nicolai), which of course doesn't prevent them from "playing with a new toy" - and that isn't bad thing.

Yet, I agree with freemangordon, that it's hardly a place for repeating the same discussion again and again. Someone think N9(50) is better? Fine. But understand basic thing:


We love to cooperate with Harma+ devs, and no one said that they should GTFO from here - yet, our "upstream" roads are totally different, and focusing infrastructure on Harma+ is a no-go for us. If forced to, we would do our best to separate (without hostility) and maintain ourselves on our own. We will be very happy, if there won't be a need for that.

/Estel