Why do everyone want this device to be something it's not? They should read some information about the Nokia 770 before ranting about it. If they did, they would know it doesn't have a phone. If it's a phone they want, then buy one of all the mobile phones in the world, and then they can sit there with a device that will be obsolete within 3 months and doesn't have a future. Me on the other hand, I enjoy the openess of the 770, developers can actually develop software for it in an OS that doesn't have severe, serious problems with exactly everything. The firmware is upgradable and distributed for *free*. Which mobile phone can do that?

No ethernet? Well, the 770 was meant to be a wireless device, so therefore, no ethernet port. It's actually as simple as that.

Why do I get the feeling that they're trying to make a chicken out of a feather? If it's a high-end device they want, then buy one. I think the people buying the 770 knows what it's suppossed to do and not do, but they bought it because they're happy with the advertised features.

I know the 770 isn't all perfect, but it's all about software. Everyone with programming skills know that. Right now the software is slow at times, but that's really fixable and in fact, they're already fixing it.

Seems like those "journalists" really have to get a clue before typing down rubbish like this...

EDIT: forgot about the battery. It all depends on how you handle it. I thought everyone knew that for a rechargable battery to reach full capacity, you've got to charge it fully, then "uncharge" it completely, and repeat that process a couple of times. Next time, please read the fscking manual.

And for the record, my battery lasts longer than three hours when connected via wifi. I'd say about 4 hours.