Evidence is all around spilling, just matter of interpretation remains. You can cherry pick data that follows your pre-determined idea (for or against Nokia doesn't matter as evident in few threads)
Worrying is the jump in logic which you also promote, lumia means prostitute therefore Nokia did that with MS. This argument is lacking at best and namecalling (or changin e->f in Nokia's CEO surname) while might gather you some support here changes nothing. Should I link again to the 'analysts' opinions iPhone will be a flop from 2007? How about you bet 100$ on Nokia fail if you feel so strongly sure. Ramblings of tomi ahonen are just the same, got nothing invested gonna cry: Buy houses in 2008. Nokia has money to keep it alive for a couple years at least, if mega-ad-push with apollo doesn't happen, gameover most likely. Name-calling while appealing doesn't change a thing