View Single Post
Posts: 322 | Thanked: 218 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#18
Originally Posted by drvar View Post
Pureview's 5 years devlopment has nothing to do with OS. If those 5 years were because of an OS, then SE would beaten N8 and few others or at least be the same. This development was more on a hardware wise.
That wasn't my point. The point was that Android has taken 3-4 years to develop into a full blown OS supporting an uncountable permutation of hardware. If Nokia had used Android, they wouldn't use 5 years to make the PureView HW work on that platform. Max 5 months (my guess, probably less). On a second thought, they probably would use 5 years, and it would still be buggy when it launched.

The second point was that they had 5 years to develop Symbian for that HW.

Hence, Ahonen's rant is nothing but pointless rant. He has serious problems.