Thread: Nokia Shareholders - lawsuit against Nokia
View Single Post
s4br0s0 is offline s4br0s0
2012-05-04 , 15:45
Posts: 395 | Thanked: 255 times | Joined on Nov 2010
#15
Originally Posted by HanzBlix
Lol did you actually read the article?
Yes i did.

Originally Posted by HanzBlix
It was more like the jjustifications of moving to WP strategy were clearly misrepresented to shareholders, now we'll (note it's class action, not a standard lawsuit) hold Elop accountable for his actions.
If i told you, the new strategy is go to WP (and give reasons that we don't know all of them) and you say yes let's go for that strategy, who's fault is it?

I sold you the idea (i'm good seller) and you buy it (you dont make the best choice), now that you see it wasn't the best choice, you are going against me?

Who is the boss here? Elop? Shareholders who put Elop as CEO?

Bad choice, take it like a man a deserve the money you lose, not cry like a baby.

If you don't want more Elop as CEO, next meeting talk about it.

Greetings.

Edit: This is priceless:

K) statements preceded by "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "foresee," "target," "estimate," "designed," "aim", "plans," "will" or similar expressions.
Who is the boss? Nokia o Windows?

…our ability to make Nokia products with Windows Phone a competitive choice for consumers, and together with Microsoft, our success in encouraging and supporting a competitive and profitable global ecosystem for Windows Phone smartphones that achieves sufficient scale, value and attractiveness to all market participants
For Windows Phone smartphones, no Nokia smartphones.
Last edited by s4br0s0; 2012-05-04 at 15:55.