I just want to add something here:

None of this is my version!

Mine works fine!

If you use the one referred to above, or any other busybox that is not my binary, then don't blame me if you have problems!

Got it!

Good. . .

--------------------------------------------------------------------

My version is, as referred to in the thread title, 1.10.0svn. and is WAY bigger.

Now, on the other hand, if you see a version called busybox-1.10.0svn.openarmel.armel.deb in some unknown repository, then well, that just might be mine

Also, if ANYONE attempts to repackage the binaries included in the above referred to package: busybox-1.10.0svn.openarmel.armel.deb ( hint, hint , I just want to make certain the package name clear . . . ) as part of a package with a different name, then I will commence legal action against them for copyright ( copyleft? ) infringement.

Specifically, if any binary included in the aforementioned package gets into a different deb [ if it's an rpm I may let it slide ] with OSSO or maemo ( in specific ) or some other distro name as part of the name of the package, then prompt and significant legal action will be taken against the person who created the package, and a DMCA request will be made to the ISP for the repository it is included in to take down the repository until said offending package has be removed from the said repository.

I have not released my source code to anyone, and the binary has markers in the executable.

If, by chance, anyone happens to run across my package, I hope you enjoy it, and I sincerely hope you have no problems with it. It has been tested very well and should work fine. I am currently unprepared, however, to host the package, or respond to questions about it. Therefore, if you do have any questions or issues regarding my package please submit them to the operator of the repository where you obtained it from. They will be forwarded to me, and if there are any issues I will attempt to resolve them and issue a package revision. I am fairly confident, however, that there are no major issues. I am hoping that in the near future I can give more information in regard to additional packages for the armel platform.

gnexus