Thread
:
[Announce] ereswap - anti swap-fragmentation tool in repos
View Single Post
reinob
2012-05-24 , 14:11
Posts: 1,808 | Thanked: 4,272 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany
#
28
Re. dbuscron,
This is not really useful information, but: on my "normal" N900 I have neither dbus-scripts nor dbuscron. On my "spare" N900 I installed dbus-scripts (however without writing any actual script) and didn't notice any (measurable) battery hit.
I later uninstalled it and installed dbuscron instead, mostly for philosophical reasons (listening to both session and system bus running a single instance of the daemon). Again, I (still) haven't written any script for it (but the swap recycle is a good candidate).
I have noticed no (measurable) battery impact with dbuscron either. Admitedly, the spare N900 is mostly unused and in off-line mode, so I charge it like once a week or so..
I suppose that the daemon itself (i.e. the listening on dbus) doesn't use much, but depending on which events trigger your script(s) the battery impact may be much bigger..
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post:
Estel
,
Sourav.dubey
,
Xagoln
reinob
View Public Profile
Send a private message to reinob
Find all posts by reinob