View Single Post
Posts: 771 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#26
Originally Posted by caveman View Post
Reading this thread was really interesting, including some links to comparisons between the N9/N8/SGS2.

If I got this right, I believe this all boils down to the touch-only interface of the N9's camera. It is *hard* not to shake the phone a bit when taking a picture, and in low-light conditions, that may make blurry images.

So the N9 camera uses higher ISO for pics in low light, when compared to other cameras, in trade of faster shutter. But higher ISO do not produce colorfull detail...

So my understanding is that if you want beautiful details in worse-than-ideal light, the N9 camera is not your best bet.

On the other hand, with good light the pics are great.

I blame the (lack of) shutter button ;-)
Im liking touch-shutter N9 better than physical shutter N8, I can take steady shot on N9 better than N8.....maybe that is just me.

it all boils down to camera software itself. Lumia 800 took overall better picture than N9. N9 only wins in Macro shot...(source is somewhere around net recently, go google)

usually, people adapts to the camera, not camera adapts to you.