View Single Post
Posts: 569 | Thanked: 462 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ USA
#12
He downloaded then "shared" them again.
He initiated another continuing, expanding sequence of the works being distributed & the owners of the works not being paid. I think it's fair & necessary.

The "share" euphemism for "steal & redistribute" that was initiated by Napster is one of the nastiest pieces of newspeak devised.