View Single Post
Posts: 1,320 | Thanked: 915 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#8
Originally Posted by mkiol View Post
Thank you all for warm response!

Honestly, Ubi is just an "hobby" experiment. I am not a professional developer and in fact I do not have a plans to be one.

I tried to compare the Android vs QT development and for me, QT is definitely a winner. I am in love how intuitive and powerful all QT ecosystem is. I did Maemo, N9 and Symbian compilation without a single line of code change.. and almost in the same way I can release Ubi package for BlackBerry 10!

It is amazing, QT is amazing!
Now if only some big headed corporate developers stop being breastfed by single device coding languages, and adopted or at least spent some time with Qt, they would switch to it, causing OS developers to adopt it.

Ohh how I wish I could control the way this world works in some aspects
__________________
Well Nokia do at least know how to build a decent phone, just apparently don't know how to support it..

N900 Died Replaced with N8, Requested E7, "Accidentally Broke E7", Now rolling with an N9 and im loving it!


My Contributions

N900 Conversations Wiki Page
 

The Following User Says Thank You to godofwar424 For This Useful Post: