View Single Post
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 315 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ DE
#1167
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
...
Therefore, even when the phone is not lost or stolen, I'd prefer SMSCON (optionally) to lock the phone after it has been booted up and SMSCON daemon has started. Is it possible?
Yes, I think so. There could be a very small timing window until smscon starts up and does the job. Hackers which know what's going on could use the time to cancel locking. May be this risk, should it really exist, is only theoretical or so minor that it can be ignored.

Generally this to me sounds like a possible solution.

Originally Posted by zimon View Post
...
If the SIM card had been changed, then based on the user settings either lock, do not lock, or run some other blocking or non-blocking app.
Yes, whereby smscon would only lock/unlock and try to notify the owner who is responsible to send further commands to start apps.

Originally Posted by zimon View Post
...
Also auto-locking after inactivity (1 - N min) should be inside smscon daemon, because the system setting for that cannot be used.
I don't understand why. Could you please explain?
-- OK, I got it. Because locking is turned of et all. Yes.

Last edited by yablacky; 2012-06-01 at 15:42. Reason: used my brain :)