View Single Post
Posts: 1,086 | Thanked: 2,964 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#184
Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
After all the discussion I think I'd choose categories over no categories, and I think that the fewer categories are better, but I would bring back the multiplatform award.(1 device from the updates category awarded to the runner up with most platforms supported)
Thanks for the feedback qwazix. As you're probably aware with the discussion over the last few pages the multi-platform award has been a bit of a headache, I like your idea to include it but how would you suggest we judge this category? For example, Maemo/Harm/Symb only, or wider non-Nokia platforms? As there are only a finite number of platforms, how would we differentiate between two entries that run on the same number of platforms? Should only new applications be considered, or existing ones? There's still a lot of questions that need answers which is why I would like to ignore the category completely if I'm honest But if we're going to include it, we need to lock this one down before the competition starts, or it could be a real can of worms later on

Originally Posted by beresk_let View Post
To tell the truth, I (as a beginner) just don't like it. Previous variant was more beginner-friendly (2 N950 and bounty share), and this one means that N950 are only for "big boys". I don't mean to give exactly 2 N950 to beginners, but 0 of them is a very disappointing option for me. Also, I wonder, where is "Science and education" category?
Thanks beresk_let. I thought as a beginner you would have liked the new proposal idea, as it's quite weighted towards beginner entries. If you mean the previous variant with 10 categories, there was never 2 N950s assigned for beginners. We have 10 N950s in total, one for each category. That was one device assigned to beginners, in addition to the chance to compete in the other categories for one N950. With the new proposal it's 2 N9s assigned to beginners, in addition to compete in the other categories for 2 N950s. So the winner of the beginners category would lose the option to chose between a N950 or N9 for a SINGLE prize device, but there would be now effectively two winners (1st and 2nd) in the Beginners category who would win a N9 each for TWO prize devices. I thought that would be better because we're creating an extra device, however I'll take your feedback onboard .. beginners are really important to the competition as we want to encourage new developers to get involved

Any other beginners out there, would you prefer the prizes in the beginners category to be the option of a N950 or N9 for a single prize, or two prizes of 2 N9s?

I don't think we've ever had a "Science & Education" category in the competition... zehjotkah/anyone? If these types of applications didn't fit into the existing categories, they could go into the catch-all 'Other' category. We want to include as much types of applications as we can, ofcourse, all are welcome

Originally Posted by davdav View Post
i am a visualbasic programmer but i know little QT so i will be happy to join the comp.
But i need to ask about the timeline
when this will begin and when it will end as i have exams right now and i cant give out time..
Thanks

./david
Welcome aboard David Timeline hasn't been set yet, but it'll run most of the summer (for us guys in the northern hemisphere) so it'll be a couple of months atleast. You'll have time to take part, and good luck with your exams
__________________
Follow me on my neglected twitter @kojacker

Cybot950 - Control a robot with your N9/N950
SMSPetFeeder - Build a Bluetooth/SMS dog feeder with Qt, N950, and arduino
Nerf950 - Use your N9/N950 to fire a Nerf gun
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kojacker For This Useful Post: