View Single Post
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#91
Well, according to some benchmarking I made with iozone, rootfs is definitely faster in reading than /opt.

Attached are the results of the following commands:

./iozone -f /opt/libQtWebKit.so.4 -a -+E -i 1 -i 2 -i 3 -i 5 -i 7 for opt.txt

./iozone -f /usr/lib/libQtWebKit.so.4 -a -+E -i 1 -i 2 -i 3 -i 5 -i 7 for rootfs.txt

the first column is data size in KB, the second is record len, the others are reading speeds in KB/s

I was not able to run iozone in sync mode with file in rootfs, it gives "invalid operation" error, so those results are not the real read transfer rates from the flash, but still are a good indication.
Attached Files
File Type: txt opt.txt (9.0 KB, 152 views)
File Type: txt rootfs.txt (9.0 KB, 144 views)
__________________
Never fear. I is here.

720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900

Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer


Last edited by freemangordon; 2012-06-13 at 12:00.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: