View Single Post
Posts: 840 | Thanked: 823 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#1566
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Didn't Microsoft already sell their mobile handset operating systems over the years to other well-established smartphone makers like Palm (like their Treo Windows phones), HP/Compaq (i.e.Jornada/iPAQ), UTStarcom (Thera/PPC), HTC (HTC7 series), and LG and Samsung. At one point they even made their own short-lived handsets a couple of years ago, Microsoft's own Kin! To say MS isn't already established, given they've had all this time, even in hardware manufacturing, seems a little funny to me.

I'm not sure how much more well-established they need to be when Apple, Google and even Symbian took off comparatively faster than Microsoft's foray into mobile. FAR faster.
In software I agree, we were discussing why they failed when they decided to get into phone hardware with the KIN. MS don't have much expertise in it and they don't have the same relationship with carriers that most established handset manufacturers have. Nokia, Ericsson, Motorola, etc have a well established relationship with carriers, they even provide the infrastructure for their networks. When the public is showing no interest in MS hardware there is little reason for the carrier to continue. Nokia as a well established manufacturer can at least get your software through the carriers.