View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#17
Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
Depends if WP8 will be high-end only or more general.
If they go for WP8 being only for high end, then they've created an area that would be bordering fragmentation (also bordering on stupid) of their platform. The same stuff that Apple and Microsoft are picking on Google about.

Just like the first gen phones got capped at WP7 7.1, it seems like the so-called "second gen", now billed at 1.5 gen phones like the Nokia Lumia 900 and even HTC Titan II are now limited to WP7 7.8 and will not get WP8.

The true second gen phones are not out yet, are coming out later in the year and the people with the "true Windows Phone 7 phone" (as stated by Elop) are left in the dark in regards to WP8 upgrades.

Simply stated, the people that were up in arms over the N9 only getting 6+ months of support from Nokia; well Nokia did it to the Lumia 900 folks too.

Karma or business per usual when dealing with Nokia.

If Nokia/MS continue WP 7.x on the low-end, there probably will be more WP7 phones sold in 2013 than WP8 devices.
The numbers dropped for Symbian, which was billed as a deadend product. It will drop for WP7 devices since they've all become deadend devices as of today's announcement. No damage control can repair this announcement.

But it is very sad to know that all the current Nokia flagship products (N9, Pureview 808, Lumia 900) run a software platform that will ultimately be abandoned sooner than competing phones with iOS and Android.
Agree 100%.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: