Sigh...
Could restate your complaint without insulting others? I'm not clear exactly what your complaint is, since you started this with personal attacks and insults, and made several complaints all at once, many of which I addressed already. (Like assumptions about the nature of the competition, and the like.)

As you can see, I'm happy to reply to people on many topics around this issue. But if I'm replying, I expect you to read what I've written, and not blindly restate arguments that have already been answered. (Like why we aren't holding people to future contribution levels when CA was based on past performance.)

Also: The complaints about the Council election were not directed at you. If I were "targeting" you with that, I would have mentioned you by name. I'm far from shy on being blunt and obvious in that reguard. You should know that by now.