View Single Post
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#72
Originally Posted by ivgalvez View Post
Apparently the problem is when you want to promote an application that is in the free repository, but depends on non-free packages.
Right. The way Debian deals with this is "contrib", perhaps we should also have one?

In fact, it's quite common to have free packages such as an open source game engine, depending on non-free stuff such as the game data, that might be re-distributable but non under an open license.
Well, the fonts are not even re-distributable according to the licence I see in the .deb. So seeing that in free scares me, people should be able to for example mirror free without having to worry about Nokia lawyers knocking on their doors tomorrow.


Right, and probably is not the only case of non-free stuff packaged in the free repository. I suspect that a lot of old-times games are in that situation.
Hm, perhaps we should perform an audit then.

Yes, his previous posts are located elsewhere. Let me search for them and I will add them here for future reference. Anyhow, reading his post in the context of the thread, it's clear that he's giving permission to distribute that stuff.
If it's a blanket re-distribution licence I'm fine with it, but I suspect it comes with strings (for example only for use on a Nokia device, or only for non-commercial use). In any case the full terns of the licence should be included in debian/copyright.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: