View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#126
Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
Well, unlike some of those who accuse me of being a liar and some others accusing the Council of having a financial interest in CA, I actually read what is written. Here you are:
You've read the thread. Some people are stating what I said. You asked, I didn't deny nor confirm it. Some people are showing in this thread how well they trust you people (Council) - it reads to me like very little if at all due to the actions of the person at question.

Are you a liar? Don't know, I said you maybe one. Maybe not.

At this moment, I don't particularly have enough reason to trust in the Council to endeavor an answer.

Like it or not, it's because you're associated with that individual. Like we say in the USA - if you lay down with dogs, you might get fleas.

And you're the second person from the Council to state that you don't care what I think. Starting to think that's another reason why you people (Council) think you could have done whatever you wished.

Who knows. By now, nobody cares. I'm done with this thread and this corrupt Council. You do not represent me in the least.

Continue to line your pockets, speak to the people of this forum in anyway you wish when they disagree with you and if they condemn you due to perceived collusion, attack them until they're as apathetic and weak as your morals seem to be.

Good job!

And yes, the above was an exercise in hyperbole. I truly just do not trust you guys any longer. No real reason to, no benefit to doing so. None of you really... but that's my take away from this all.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: