View Single Post
Posts: 35 | Thanked: 149 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#542
Originally Posted by wicket View Post
One of the reasons I was initially drawn to the N900 was because it is a fully functional computer that can fit in my pocket. IMHO a mobile computer should be able to do everything any other computer can do. Yes there are hardware limitations on a mobile device - I know that compiling on the device will be slow and will reduce my battery life but I don't have a problem with that.

Given that Jolla's core is Mer, I expect it will have proper multi-tasking anyway.
Exactomundo! Jolla would indeed be ill advised, not to use multitasking. Sooner or later all mobile OS will have to overcome such artifical restrictions, because the hardware is getting more and more powerful. These devices will replace more and more PCs or notebooks, if the user can use them like such simply by attaching HMI devices (like a docking station).

One comment to the argument "wild running apps drain the battery": Wouldn't it be enough to display a coloured circle somewhere near the battery symbol to indicate the system load? Even some cars indicate their current fuel consumption, so the driver can shift gears to save fuel. I think almost every similar approach would be more reasonable than artifical restrictions like "optimised multitasking", however intelligent and sophisticated designed and implemented that would be.

One of the most convincing arguments for multitasking has been presented by Microsoft: They were not able to use Skype (which has been bought for a huge amount of money) on their Lumia devices for the simple reason: They needed an interface to compensate missing multitasking. This is ridiculous.