View Single Post
Posts: 322 | Thanked: 218 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#2001
Originally Posted by cheve View Post
you have missed the point. at least for where i live, big national chains all offer 'deal' like that - ie. you pay some $$ up front and then tie to some 2 or 3 yr contract. it may sound a rip off to you, but these are the options the average joe/jane can have. the point i am making is this: for these national chains to offer the Lumia 900 with such terms within such a short time after official release of Lumia 900, it really means that this phone is not selling well at all - bad news for Nokia.

Here are other reference points(all with 3yr contract term) for you - SGS3 ( $129), SGS2 ( $0), iphone 4 ($99, 32GB, this is not 4s), the iphone 4s($160 for 16GB; $270 for 32GB), blackberry bold ($75). As a re-cap, nokia Lumia 900 ( $0, plus $100 gift card). These asking prices reflect the highest $$$ that the average public are willing to pay. it does not look good for Lumia 900, specifically, at about 1 month ago, they were asking for $50 or so.
Fair enough. But that is not a free market. A three year contract is way too long. Only the phones with a track record can hope to compete on such terms. Or more correct, the phone with a track record (top Galaxy, iPhones etc) will have huge advantages. Even a one year contract is dubious regarding the principles of free competition.

Nevertheless, the Lumia 900 seems to be DOA also here. The Lumia 800 and 610 are selling well though. They are cheaper off contract and are also offered with cheaper contracts.