I already made it clear, but I'll repeat it for you. Being concise is a gift some people have and they use it to make a clear point. He did not make clear what exactly was contradictory in the texts, he repeated verbatim everything that was posted, even the largely irrelevant parts. Asyndetic thinking is not good for making a point and that post was full of it.

That blog post is very poorly written and structured, it does itself no favours in getting a point across, making it difficult to follow the writers thought process. I do not care for the poorly written English either, just that it be better than a verbose copy of everything said in a blog with something akin to "do you see it? the guys an idiot" appended inbetween. Spare me with the "makes perfect sense", "what's so hard" nonsense. Not that I care about what Tomi said or did but if you you wish to write in a more concise, better structured manner where the contradiction or disagreement lays with the author then I'll gladly read it too.