Thread
:
Thumb2 vs non-thumb memory usage comarisions
View Single Post
stlpaul
2012-07-27 , 22:43
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#
6
I think would be most useful if we're comparing the same configuration, one with thumb and one without.
If someone has a spare N900 and a few hours to kill, I think a good test would be:
- complete reflash including eMMC
- disable HAM auto-updates so it does not run apt worker in background while we're trying to take readings
- install CSSU (regular)
- reboot and take memory readings after X minutes uptime (to allow tracker to settle)
- install CSSU-thumb
- reboot and take memory readings after same X minutes uptime
This way we are comparing same to same.
It just so happens I have a spare N900 and maybe I'll try this if I find a few hours and someone else does not beat me to it.
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to stlpaul For This Useful Post:
Estel
,
foobar
,
freemangordon
,
Mentalist Traceur
,
Nobless
,
Sourav.dubey
stlpaul
View Public Profile
Send a private message to stlpaul
Find all posts by stlpaul