View Single Post
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 426 times | Joined on Nov 2010 @ Italy, Lombardia
#412
Originally Posted by Estel View Post
In any case, it doesn't sound to be U-boot problem, at all.
Four-Five months ago I was 1.5-1.8% per hour with U-Boot and only 0.5-0.6% per hour without.
Same software, same kernel, same use (idle)

And that version of U-Boot seems already contemplating the fix for the L2 cache.
If even now (not saying that both are still so many tests to confirm whether or not the situation) I had the same result would be hard to say that U-Boot is not involved

Last edited by Fabry; 2012-07-30 at 01:39.