Thread: N900 clock replacement [continued]
View Single Post
ade is offline ade
2012-09-04 , 11:32
Posts: 1,100 | Thanked: 2,797 times | Joined on Apr 2011 @ Netherlands
#287
Originally Posted by ivgalvez View Post
Yes, but the point here, is that it has been clarified in recent conversation at #maemo-ssu, that this shouldn't block the package to enter CSSU-Devel, only maybe for Testing.

You only need to ask for permission to access CSSU-Devel. That would make easier for people to install it and test it.
I understand, but I don't want to mess up things for users, so I also want some advice from these guys on how to do that the proper way.

@megaexer:
I didn't know the stock clock behaved like that. But it sounds logical and will look at it.

Edit: just had a discussion on #maemo-ssu:
Merlin1991 is going to create a package of the clock replacement (before the HAM modications are done). I think he is more skilled to make the right choices for this package than me. Can't give any exact date of when it will be ready.

Edit2:
Just updated both versions. Accepting a time while editing will now make an inactive alarm active (conform stock clock).
In the case of the version with date function: accepting a date will do the same.
Last edited by ade; 2012-09-04 at 20:23.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ade For This Useful Post: