I find it odd that someone with no interaction would want to pick this thread to jump in and sing praises of Windows Phone and how it's natural for the unenlightened to be against it but it's surely the fantastic choice.

Anyway, just to end the discussion on the fakes, it has been confirmed that the stills were faked too, and anyone who claimed differently is now once and forever proved to be peremptory with no basis in fact. There.

The official story is that the images were made to illustrate a difference between image stabilization and no image stabilization. The girl-in-helsinki-at-night scene had professional lightning and a system camera were used. Anyway, they say that without professional lightning, even a system camera would not be able to take that photo, because where she's standing, she'd not have a street light near and she'd not be front lit like that. And then, a picture from the photo shoot surfaced, so that's that.

Image stabilization can't add a large light source, it turns out.





A source