Well I haven't changed my position that much: for the NFP entity, I said any name goes as we are not trying to create a brand or anything. But reading from some contributions, I just realized that the enthusiasm (including mine) shown in this thread mostly comes from a misunderstanding: ie believing that this name will impact this site and the users, whereas in truth this name will appear around here pretty much as often as the name "nokia" does.

We are discussing the replacement of a "very specific name, closely tied to the community, but not entirely fit" for a "wildly used name, loosely tied, but certainly more inclusive" one, and my latest opinion (which is personal) on that is simply "probably not worth it". Not such a big deal.