Of course I've did that, and I still think that bb-power place is in CSSU, much more than any other components belonging to CSSU already.

Also, I did not buy the "developer need to dance around CSSU team, to get his work included" philosophy - instead of just being ready to maintain his piece of work inside CSSU, when it gets included. Feel free to disagree.

Now, where I'm spreading misinformation? Isn't it true, that every update of busybox via thing like CSSU will cause problems with already installed bb-power, requiring user to reinstall it, to trigger postinst binary replacement? Isn't it true, that including busybox-power in CSSU would solve that? Or, maybe it isn't true, that Nicolai's camera-ui2 is included in CSSU, and ade's worldclock replacement isn't, only because philosophy of maintaining CSSU changed since camera-ui2?

Please, be precise, as I'm not very tolerant of accusing me of disinformation, without being precise Yourself - even if done by so respected (also by me, probably to no limits) person like You. Thanks in advance.

/Estel